IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
FAO No.4194 of 2017 (OM)
Date of Decision:01.11.2018
Om Parkash Sharma . . . . . Appellant
Sunita Sharma . . . . . Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: – None for the appellant.
Mr.Nitin Jain, Advocate, for the respondent.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
This appeal is filed by the husband against the decree of divorce
passed by the learned trial Court.
In the application bearing CMM-165-2017, filed by respondent-
wife for seeking maintenance pendente lite, there was no representation on
behalf of the appellant-husband as his counsel did not appear thereafter
continuously on two dates i.e. on12.10.2018 30.10.2018. Today also there
is no representation on behalf of the appellant-husband.
In view thereof, the present appeal is hereby dismissed for
non-prosecution. However, the respondent-wife still has a right to recover
the amount of maintenance pendente lite awarded by this Court by resorting
to the legal remedy available to her.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
Whether speaking /reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
1 of 1
10-11-2018 22:09:35 :::