HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 1540 / 2017
Smt Manju W/o Om Prakash Suhalka, New Colony, Village Kharva,
Balicha Gram Panchayat, Nearby Jeevantara Resort, Tehsil Girva,
District Udaipur.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2155 / 2017
Om Prakash Suhalka S/o Sukh Lal Suhalka,, Aged About 61 Years,
Resident of New Colony, Village Kharva, Balicha Gram Panchayat,
Nearby Jeevantara Resort, Tehsil Girva, District Udaipur.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
—-Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ramesh Purohit.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.A.S.Rathore, P.P.
For Complainant(s): Mr.K.S.Rathore.
_____________________________________________________
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
30/03/2017
These two anticipatory bail applications have been filed by
the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.4/2017, Women Police Station, Udaipur, for the offences under
Sections 498A and 406 I.P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public
Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the
material available on record.
Having regard to totality of facts and circumstances as
available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments
advanced at the Bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case
(2 of 2)
[ CRLMB-1540/2017]
for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438
Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is
directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners viz. Om Prakash
Suhalka and Smt.Manju in connection with F.I.R. No.4/2017,
Women Police Station, Udaipur, for the offences under Sections,
the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided each of them
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
conditions :-
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself/herself/themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer as and when
required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
A copy of this order be placed in both the files.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/tarun goyal/
Sr.P.A