SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Omanayamma vs The State Of Kerala on 29 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

FRIDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1941

Bail Appl..No. 2344 of 2019
CRIME NO. 482/2019 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 3:

1 OMANAYAMMA
AGED 61 YEARS
W/O. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI,
SREEVILASAM HOUSE, GRAMAM MURI, ENNAKKAD, CHENGANNUR
TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

2 BALAKRISHNA PILLAI,
AGED 71 YEARS
S/O. KUNJAN PILLAI,
SREEVILASAM HOUSE, GRAMAM MURI, ENNAKKAD, CHENGANNUR
TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SMT.S.L.SYLAJA

RESPONDENTS/STATE COMPLAINANT:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 31.

2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 689 622.

SMT PRIYA SHANAVAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.03.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.No.2344 of 2019
2

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

B.A.No.2344 of 2019

Dated this the 29th day of March, 2019

ORDER

The petitioners are accused Nos.2 3 in Crime No.482 of 2019 of

Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha which has been registered for offence

punishable under Secs.498A 34 of the IPC.

2. The petitioners are the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the

lady de facto complainant. The 1 st petitioner is aged more than 61 years

and the 2nd petitioner is aged more than 71 years and they are stated to

suffer from old age ailments.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations raised against the

petitioners in the instant crime, this Court is inclined to consider the plea

for pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of the

petitioners being arrested by police in connection with the abovesaid crime,

they shall be released on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.40,000/-

each and on furnishing two solvent sureties for the like sum, both to the

satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned.
B.A.No.2344 of 2019
3

(a) Petitioners shall not involve in any criminal offences of similar nature.

(b) Petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(c) Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when
required in that connection.

(d) Petitioners shall not influence witness or shall not tamper or attempt
to tamper evidence in any manner, whatsoever.

4. If the petitioners do not comply with the directions, then the
benefit of the directions issued by this Court will automatically stand
vacated without any further orders.

5. If the petitioners violate all or any of the bail conditions, then
the jurisdictional court concerned will stand hereby authorised, to
consider the plea for cancellation of bail, if required, in accordance with
law.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail Application

will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS
JUDGE
vgd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation