SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ompal Kashyap vs State Of U.P. on 4 December, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 72

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 52982 of 2019

Applicant :- Ompal Kashyap

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Submission is that the victim has implicated the applicant being her neighbour. There is neighbourly dispute between them. The victim has stated before the doctor only offence under Section 354 I.P.C was alleged. She did not got herself medically examined. There is no allegation of rape in the first information report also. It has been submitted that the victim is a married woman and she is major. The applicant is in jail since 09.09.2019 and has no criminal to his credit.

On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the above submissions.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted herein above, larger mandate of the SectionArticle 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant, Ompal Kashyap, involved in Case Crime No.438 of 2019, under Sections 452, Section376 IPC, Police Station Subhash Nagar, District- Bareilly be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.

5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

Order Date :- 4.12.2019

SS

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation