SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Onkar Chand vs State Of Punjab on 27 February, 2019

CRM-M-13346-2018
1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-13346-2018 (OM)
Date of decision: 27.2.2019

Onkar Chand
… Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

State of Punjab and another
…Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI

Present: Ms. Simmy, Advocate, for
Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate,
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramdeep Partap Singh, DAG, Punjab.
*****

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of

Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case

FIR No.345 dated 26.9.2017 registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 406, 498A, 506 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Phillaur,

District Jalandhar (Rural).

Heard.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been

effected between the parties and a quashing petition on the basis of

compromise bearing CRM-M-5222-2019 has also been filed which is

pending consideration. Even a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu

Marriage Act has also been filed.

Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Harjit Singh

states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not more

1 of 2
10-03-2019 05:41:59 :::
CRM-M-13346-2018
2

required for custodial interrogation.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed and the order dated 2.11.2018 is made absolute till the

presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation as and when required by the police;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly,

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so

as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the

Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the

prior permission of the trial Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the

presentation of challan in Court.

(RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI)
February 27, 2019 JUDGE
Paritosh Kumar

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
10-03-2019 05:42:00 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation