SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Order vs Unknown on 8 January, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

WEDNESDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 18TH POUSHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.9226 OF 2019

CRIME NO.887/2019 OF Sakthikulangara Police Station , Kollam

PETITIONES/2nd ACCUSED:

MINI ALEX(A2)
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O.ALEX, SHARON NIVAS, NEENDAKARA.P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.
SRI.BINU GEORGE
SMT.HEMALATHA

RESPONDENT/STATE:

STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

SRI. SANTHOSH PETER – PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.9226 OF 2019

2

Bail Appication No.9226 of 2019
———————————————–

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed

under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The petitioner is the second accused in Crime

No.887 of 2019 of Sakthikulangara Police Station registered

under Sections 498A, 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code. The first accused in the said case is the son

of the petitioner. The crime aforesaid is registered at the

instance of the wife of the first accused, and the allegation as

against the petitioner, the second accused is that she has

harassed the de facto complainant for dowry.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

as also the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. It is seen that the crime is one registered on a

private complaint filed by the de facto complainant in the year
Bail Appl..No.9226 OF 2019

3

2019 alleging that the petitioner has harassed the defacto

complainant sometime during 2015.

In the circumstances, I am of the view that the

petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the crime aforesaid

on the following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall make herself available for
interrogation before the Investigating Officer within
seven days from today. She shall also make
herself available for interrogation before the
Investigating Officer as and when directed by the
Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

ii) If the petitioner is arrested prior to, or after her
appearance before the Investigating Officer, she
shall be released from custody on execution of a
bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each for
the like sum.

(iii) The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate
the prosecution witnesses nor shall she attempt to
tamper with the evidence of the prosecution.

Bail Appl..No.9226 OF 2019

4

iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other
offence while on bail.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

PV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation