SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

P Ramesh vs State Of Karnataka By on 25 January, 2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF JANUARY 2019

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7171 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

1. P RAMESH
S/O LATE PAPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

2. SMT SARASWATHI R
W/O P RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 ARE
R/AT NO.151/2, GROUND FLOOR,
26TH CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, YEDIYUR,
JAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560082

3. V RANGASWAMY
S/O LATE C.R.VENKATARAMANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

4. SMT YASHODHAMMA
W/O V RANGASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

PETITONERS NO. 3 4 ARE
R/AT NO.13, 15TH MAIN,
MARIYAPPANAPALYA,
MAGADI ROAD,
2

BENGALURU-560023

5. SRI BALAKRISHNA
S/O N KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT NO.151, 26TH A CROSS,
6TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560070
… PETITIONERS

(BY SMT : DEEPA C, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
JAYANAGARA POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU-560011

2. SMT B N SUJATHA
W/O LATE P LAKSHMI NARASIMHA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT NO.U-25, III CROSS,
PIPE LINE, KRISHNAPPA BLOCK,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560003
… RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI: I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
LEARNED II ACMM, BANGALORE IN CR.NO.167/2016
(PCR.NO.1307/2016).

THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
3

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.

Perused the records.

2. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the

FIR in Cr.No.167/2016 registered for the offences punishable under

sections 209, 415, 420, 463, 464, 468, 498A, 499, 506 r/w 34 IPC.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SPP-II who

has taken notice for respondent No.1 State submits that on completion

of investigation, a ‘B’ report has been submitted to the Court on

24.01.2018.

In view of the said development, the petition does not survive

for consideration and hence the petition is dismissed as it does not

survive for consideration.

In view of dismissal of the main matter, I.A.No.1/2016 for stay

does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE
*mn/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation