SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pala Ram And Anr vs State Of Haryana on 7 February, 2018

CRM No.M-48372 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 48372 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: February 07 , 2018.

Pala Ram and another …… PETITIONER (s)


State of Haryana …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioners in FIR No.226 dated 02.05.2016 under Sections 120B/307/304B/302/

498A IPC, registered at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal.

The petitioners who are the parents-in-law of the deceased, have

been summoned on an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. as additional

accused to face trial in aforesaid FIR. The petitioners, it is submitted, have

appeared before the learned trial court pursuant to order dated 22.12.2017

passed by this Court and admitted to interim bail. Charge against the petitioners

has since been framed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

1 of 2
12-02-2018 00:13:52 :::
CRM No.M-48372 of 2017

petitioners undertake to face the proceedings and appear on each and every date

fixed before the learned trial court. Therefore, it is prayed that this petition be


Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from AS Satpal,

verifies that the petitioners have appeared before the learned trial court. It is not

denied that the petitioners were found innocent during investigation and

subsequently summoned on an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

Petitioners are not reported to be involved in any other criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioners

are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from

deposing true facts before the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed. Consequently, interim bail afforded to the petitioners

pursuant to order dated 22.12.2017 passed by this Court be made absolute

subject to their furnishing fresh bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the

learned trial court.

It is clarified that none of the observations made hereinabove shall

be construed to be a reflection on the merits of the case. The same are solely

confined for the purpose of decision of the present petition.

February 07 , 2018. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
12-02-2018 00:13:54 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation