SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pankaj Kumar Thakur @ Pankaj … vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 January, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.77971 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-910 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE
District- Madhubani

Pankaj Kumar Thakur @ Pankaj Thakur S/o Lochan Thakur, R/o Vill.-
Ladaut, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Khushbu Kumari W/o Raghu Thakur, R/o Vill.- Ladaut, P.S.- Benipatti,
District- Madhubani. At present R/o Vill.- Chandrasenpur, P.S.- Rahika,
District- Madhubani.

… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER

2 04-01-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in

connection with Complaint Petition Vide C.R. No. 910/2017,

T.R. No. 2809/2017, disclosing offences under Sections 323,

504, 354, 379, 498(A), 342, 494, 147 of the Indian Penal Code,

Section 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3, 4 of Dayan

Act.

Allegation as per the complaint petition is that the

petitioner has tried to misbehave with the complainant, who

happens to be his Bhabhi. There is also allegation of cruelty and

torture against the family members of the petitioner to the

informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77971 of 2018(2) dt.04-01-2019
2/2

that he is the Devar of the complainant and only allegation

against him is that he tried to misbehave with the complainant

and no offence under Section 354 IPC is made out against the

petitioner.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the above

submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above

named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

S.D.J.M., Madhubani, in connection with Complaint Petition

Vide C.R. No. 910/2017, T.R. No. 2809/2017, subject to the

condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
Amjad/-

U T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation