SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pappu Ram @ Khangara Ram vs State on 5 May, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4333 / 2018
Pappu Ram @ Khangara Ram S/o Ganga Ram, B/c Jat R/o
Bachdau, Police Thana Dhorimanna District Barmer. (At Present
Lodged in Dist. Jail Barmer)

—-Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, PP
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
05/05/2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on

record.

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with CR

No.145/2016 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer for

offence under Sections 498A, 304B/302 IPC. He has preferred this

bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier bail was

granted to the petitioner but he jumped the bail on 06.10.2017.

Now the petitioner is in judicial custody. Counsel further assures

this Court that in future, the petitioner will remain present on each

and every date before the trial court and if he again jumps the

bail then the indulgence of bail may not be extended to the

petitioner.

(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-4333/2018]

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it

just and proper to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner

with the condition that he will appear before the concerned Police

Station on 10th of each month, failing which Public Prosecutor may

file application for cancellation of bail.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pappu Ram @ Khangara

Ram S/o Ganga Ram shall be released on bail in connection with

No.145/2016 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer

provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-

with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the

satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that

court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon

to do so till the completion of the trial.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG)J.

Ms/-85

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation