SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Paramjit Kaur @ Rajni vs Madan Lal on 22 April, 2019

FAO Nos.5581 7727 of 2017 -1-

1. FAO-5581-2017
Date of Decision:22.04.2019
Madan Lal
. . . . . Appellant

Manjot Sharma minor through his mother
. . . . . Respondent
2. FAO-7727-2017
Paramjit Kaur @ Rajni
. . . . . Appellant

Madan Lal
. . . . . Respondent


Present: – Mr.Tribhawan Singla, Advocate,
for the appellant (in FAO-5581-2017)
for the respondent (in FAO-7727-2017)

Mr.Hitesh Verma, Advocate,
for the appellant (in FAO-7727-2017)
for the respondent (in FAO-5581-2017)


This order shall dispose of two appeals bearing FAO-5581-

2017 titled as “Madan Lal Vs. Manjot Sharma (minor) through his

mother” [hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1st appeal’] and FAO-7727-2017

titled as “Paramjit Kaur @ Rajni Vs. Madan Lal” [hereinafter referred to as

‘the 2nd appeal’] as the 2nd appeal was ordered to be heard with the 1st appeal

vide order dated 28.11.2017 passed in the 2nd appeal.

In brief, the 1st appeal has been filed by Madan Lal being

aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated 15.7.2017 passed by the

1 of 3
28-04-2019 09:52:04 :::
FAO Nos.5581 7727 of 2017 -2-

District Judge, Family Court, Barnala in a suit filed under Order 33 and

Rules 1 2 of the CPC in forma pauperis for recovery of maintenance

under the Hindu Adoptions and SectionMaintenance Act, 1956 and also for

permanent injunction. The 2nd appeal has been filed by Paramjit Kaur @

Rajni, divorced wife of Madan Lal, against the order dated 28.10.2017

passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Barnala by which application

filed under Section 25 of the Guardians and SectionWards Act, 1890 for seeking

custody of minor Manjot Sharma has been allowed.

It is an admitted case that a compromise had been arrived at

between them before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court,

which was reduced into writing on 19.1.2018. However, in terms of the

compromise, both the appeals were to be disposed of but Madan Lal had

made a complaint to this Court that Paramjit Kaur @ Rajni is not complying

with the conditions of compromise much less contained in Clause 6(b) (i)

and (ii) as she is not allowing him to meet his son Manjot Sharma. In view

thereof, the case was adjourned on 28.3.2019 for today and the parties were

directed to be present in Court.

We have interacted with Madan Lal, his divorced wife Paramjit

Kaur @ Rajni and their son Manjot Sharma in our Chambers. There was

some reservation shown by Manjot Sharma, aged 9 years, in going to the

house of Madan Lal on the pretext that his other wife, namely, Jasbir Kaur is

not behaving properly with him. During interaction, Madan Lal has assured

us that Manjot Sharma would not face any kind of difficulty in future insofar

as his wife Jasbir Kaur is concerned. Paramjit Kaur @ Rajni has also

submitted before us that she has no objection if the child Manjot Sharma is

taken by Madan Lal to his house in terms of the conditions of the

compromise much less contained in Clause 6(b) (i) and (ii).

2 of 3
28-04-2019 09:52:05 :::
FAO Nos.5581 7727 of 2017 -3-

In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the

present appeals which are hereby disposed of in terms of the compromise

arrived at between the parties dated 19.1.2018.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected



22.04.2019 JUDGE

Whether speaking /reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No

3 of 3
28-04-2019 09:52:05 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation