SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Parmal Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 28 May, 2019

CRM-M-11382-2019 1


279 CRM-M-11382-2019
Date of Decision:28.05.2019

Parmal Singh and others …..Petitioners


State of Punjab and others …..Respondents


Present: None for the petitioners.

Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, D.A.G., Punjab,
for respondent No.1.

None for respondent Nos.2 to 5.



Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for

quashing of FIR No.294 dated 04.08.2018 under Sections 452, Section323, Section294,

Section506, Section148, Section149 IPC (the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC was

added later on), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar

(Mohali), Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.12.2018 (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 12.03.2019 had directed the parties

to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court to get their statements

recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the

genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, a communication dated

24.05.2019 has been received from learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class,

1 of 2
10-06-2019 04:06:40 :::
CRM-M-11382-2019 2

Dera Bassi to the effect that respondent No.2-Rahul Prajapati and

respondent No.5-Vicky were the complainants, who have appeared before

learned Magistrate and in their separate statements, they have stated that

they have not entered into any compromise with the accused persons, but

the accused persons under the coercion of police officials had got our

signatures on the compromise. Since the compromise has been disputed by

the complainants, the very petition seeking quashing of FIR in question on

the basis of compromise is liable to be dismissed at this stage.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed.

However, in case a fresh compromise is arrived at between the

parties, they would be at liberty to file a fresh petition seeking quashing of

FIR on the basis of compromise.

May 28, 2019 (HARI PAL VERMA)
seema JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
10-06-2019 04:06:40 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation