SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Parminder Singh vs State Of Punjab Etc on 7 March, 2018

CRM No.M-9508 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 9508 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: March 07 , 2018.

Parminder Singh …… PETITIONER (s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Jasjit Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.

None for the complainant/respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


This petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.58 dated 02.06.2015 under Sections 406/498A IPC,

registered at Police Station Women Cell, Ludhiana.

The petitioner had earlier gone to Dubai. He was declared a

proclaimed offender. However, he had appeared before the learned trial court

pursuant to orders passed in CRM No.M-9577 of 2017. The said petition was

disposed of on 09.05.2017.

In the the present proceedings, the matter was placed before the

1 of 2
11-03-2018 01:29:39 :::
CRM No.M-9508 of 2017

Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. At one point of time, it was

expressed that the parties wish to resume cohabitation, but the same did not

fructify. It is thereafter noted by this Court on 02.11.2017 that both the

petitioner and respondent No.2 expressed their desire to part ways amicably.

Respondent No.2 was earlier amenable to part ways with the petitioner, in case a

sum of `10,00,000/- is handed over to her of all claims, but she reduced the

amount to `6,00,000/-. The petitioner however did not agree to part with

anything over and above `2,00,000/-.

The matter was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner on two occasions thereafter. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that he has instructions to withdraw this petition.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Bhajan

Singh, submits that the petitioner has in fact left the country without seeking

permission from the Court.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above and

especially the conduct of the petitioner, this petition is dismissed.

March 07 , 2018. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
11-03-2018 01:29:41 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation