C.R.R. 415 of 2019
SB Court 29
In the matter of : Partha Sana Ors.
Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee
Mr. Nazir Ahmed
……For the petitioners
Mr. M. M. Verma
Ms. Punam Verma
Mr. Abhishek Verma
…… For the O.P. Nos. 2 3
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits that this is an application for quashing of a proceeding under
sections 406, 498A 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. He
submits that at the intervention of common friends and family
members, a settlement and compromise had been arrived at between
the private parties and accordingly this application for quashing was
filed on the ground of compromise and settlement. As per the
settlement, the application for mutual divorce under section 13B of the
Hindu Marriage Act was allowed by the learned Civil Court.
The learned advocate for the opposite party no. 2 / de facto –
complainant and the opposite party no. 3 / the victim lady supports the
contentions of the learned advocate for the petitioners and submits
that a compromise and settlement had been arrived at between the
private parties. He submits that the private parties would like to file
joint compromise application praying for quashing of the proceeding
on the ground of compromise and settlement.
Let the petitioners serve a copy of this application upon the State
through the learned Public Prosecutor and upon the opposite party
nos. 2 and 3 by speed post with acknowledgement due, within a week.
An affidavit of service to that effect shall be filed on the next date of
Let this matter appear under the heading ‘Contested Application’
two weeks hence.
The impugned proceeding shall remain stayed for a period of four
weeks from this date.
Liberty is granted to the parties to pray for extension or
modification or variation or vacating of the interim order after service of
notice on the other side.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)