SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pawan Kumar vs Golden @ Goldy on 22 January, 2019

FAO No.8182 of 2017 (O M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

*****
224
FAO No.8182 of 2017 (O M)
Date of Decision: 22.01.2019

Pawan Kumar
. . . . .Appellant

Vs.

Golden @ Goldy
. . . . . Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present: – Mr. N. K. Malhotra, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)

This appeal has arisen from the judgment and decree dated

30.08.2017 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge (Family Court),

Faridabad by which petition filed by the respondent-wife under Section 13 (1)

(i-a) (II) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘Act’ – for short) was allowed.

At the time of preliminary hearing, notice was issued to the

respondent in the application for condonation of delay and the appellant was

also directed to bring a draft of `25,000/- to be paid to the respondent-wife

towards interim litigation expenses. It was also mentioned that the appellant

would pay the entire maintenance pendente lite fixed by the learned lower

Court. Thereafter the case has been adjourned twice for the compliance of the

order dated 15.12.2017 but today learned counsel for the appellant has

1 of 2
10-02-2019 10:23:54 :::
FAO No.8182 of 2017 (O M) -2-

informed us that despite his repeated messages to the appellant for the purpose

of payment of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses, he has not

received any information from him.

In view of the aforesaid, the appellant does not have a right to be

heard on merits of the case.

Therefore, the present appeal is hereby dismissed.

(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
JUDGE

(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
22.01.2019 JUDGE
A.Kaundal

Whether speaking /reasoned : Yes/No

Whether Reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
10-02-2019 10:23:54 :::

1 thought on “Pawan Kumar vs Golden @ Goldy on 22 January, 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh