SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 12 July, 2018


Date of decision: 12.07.2018

Pawan Kumar


State of Haryana


Present: Mr. D.K. Tuteja, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.



This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 6 dated

02.02.2018 under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 354, 377, 34 IPC, registered at

Women Police Station Dadri.

Ms. Pooja Arora, Advocate, has appeared and filed power of

attorney on behalf of the complainant.

This Court was pleased to pass the following order on

19.03.2018 :-

“Counsel for the petitioner contends that the
allegations made in the FIR would not constitute any
offence under Sections 406/498-A of the IPC. In fact, all
the allegations, made regarding offence under Section
377 IPC, would not borne out from the transcript of a
phone recording that took place between the husband

1 of 2
22-07-2018 16:59:25 :::
CRM-M-11507-2018 -2-

and wife, Annexure P-4. It is further argued that a
reading of the said transcript would show that dispute, if
any, is regarding the insistence of the petitioner to look
after his aged parents. It is further submitted that the
petitioner is ready to join investigation as well as to
hand over the said phone recording.

Notice of motion for 12.07.2018.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be
released on interim bail subject to his furnishing
personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of
Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner
shall join the investigation as and when called upon to
do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided
under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.”

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the factum

of joining investigation by the petitioner.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is

allowed and interim order dated 19.03.2018 is hereby made absolute subject

to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper

the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and

will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

12.07.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR)
Satyawan JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.
Whether reportable No.

2 of 2
22-07-2018 16:59:26 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation