10-wp-2477.2018.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2477 OF 2018
Pawan Ramesh Alreja and anr. … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents
Adv Shantanu Phanse for the petitioners.
Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State.
Adv Vriddhi Maria for respondent no. 2.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 06, 2020
P.C.:
Petitioners are present with their advocate. Respondent
no.2 complainant is present with her advocate and learned APP
appears for respondent no. 1.
2. The matrimonial dispute between the parties led to FIR
under Sectionsection 498A, Section406 and Section34 IPC. The mediation failed and
during the pendency of the present matter, parties have
amicably settled the dispute.
3. Accordingly affidavit in support of the consent terms is
tendered by respondent no. 2 today. Petitioners have tendered
consent terms.
nilegaonkar 1/2
::: Uploaded on – 07/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 07/01/2020 23:30:01 :::
10-wp-2477.2018.odt
4. The marriage between the parties is dissolved on
31/12/2019 by the Family Court, Bandra in Petition No. 432 of
2017. The amount of Rs. 6 lacs was then made over to
respondent no. 2. Today the demand draft for balance amount of
Rs. 6 lacs has been made over to her in court.
5. In view of these developments and joint request, we make
the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
nilegaonkar 2/2
::: Uploaded on – 07/01/2020 07/01/2020 23:30:01 :::
