SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pawan Thakur vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 January, 2024

Allahabad High Court

Pawan Thakur vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 January, 2024

Author: Krishan Pahal

Bench: Krishan Pahal

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Neutral Citation No. – 2024:AHC:7862

Court No. – 75

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. – 2519 of 2023

Applicant :- Pawan Thakur

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Dewendra Singh,Sarita Kumari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Krishan Pahal,J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

3. Heard Sri Dewendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

4. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.63 of 2022, registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 406, 504 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Gorakhpur with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the instant case is clear misuse of dowry laws. Learned counsel has stated that after thorough investigation the police was pleased to delete the Section 377 I.P.C. and final report (charge-sheet) has been submitted under Sections 498-A, 323, 506, 406 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act. Learned counsel has further stated that the applicant has not misused the interim protection granted to him vide order dated 20.2.2023 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 Cr.P.C. No.12665 of 2022.

6. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest. Learned counsel has stated that the applicant undertakes that he has co-operated in the investigation and is ready to do so in trial also failing which the State can move appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail.

7. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.

8. On due consideration to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the applicant is liable to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of “Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 5 SCC 1”. The future contingencies regarding the anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.

9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. Let the accused-applicant- Pawan Thakur be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime (supra) on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(iii). that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;

(iv). that in case charge-sheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;

(v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;

(vi). that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;

(vii). that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court concerned shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.

10. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and shall not affect the trial.

Order Date :- 17.1.2024

Vikas

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation