SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pradeep Singh Bisht Vs. State of Uttarakhand through Chief Secretary [19/07/19]

Pradeep Singh Bisht Anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand through Chief Secretary Ors.

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5681-5682/2019 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2733-2734/2015]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5683-5684/2019 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2751-2752/2015]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5679-5680/2019 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2685-2686/2015]

O R D E R

Leave granted.

We have read and considered the order of the High Court impugned in the present appeals. We have heard learned counsels for the parties. On due consideration, we find that the High Court in coming to the impugned conclusions and in directing for eviction of the appellants/removal of alleged encroachments, had arrived at conclusions not supported by the documents on record. Merely because the report of the Advocate-Commissioners appointed by the Court had indicated that the appellants had raised unauthorised construction, the High Court could not have come to the impugned conclusions and issued directions as stated above. We are equally surprised that the Municipal Corporation, which now support the order of the High Court, did not take any action in the matter and did not exericse its power under the Statutes.

In the above circumstances, we allow the appeals set aside the order of the High Court and grant liberty to the Municipal Corporation to proceed in accordance with law, if so advised.

………………..CJI [Ranjan Gogoi]

…………………J. [Deepak Gupta]

…………………J. [Aniruddha Bose]

New Delhi;

July 19, 2019.

ITEM NO.60

SECTION X

Pradeep Singh Bisht Anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand through Chief Secretary Ors.

[Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 2685-2686/2015 arising out of Impugned final Judgment and Order dated 15-01-2015 In CLMA Nos. 11205/2014 and 11206/2014 and CWP No. 31/2012 Passed By The High Court of Uttarakhand At Nainital]

[IA No. 3/2015 – Intervention Application]

[SLP(C) Nos. 2733-2734/2015 (X)]

[SLP(C) Nos. 2751-2752/2015 (X)]

[App for Permission to file Additional Documents on IA 3/2015]

Date: 19-07-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
HON’BLEMR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

For Petitioner:
Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Mona Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR
Ms. Shashi Kiran, AOR
Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Arjun Sain, Adv.
Mr. Manoj Jain, Adv.
Mr. Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari, Adv.
Ms. Surbhi Mehta, AOR

For Respondent:
Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Adv.
Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR
Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Kanva, Adv.
Mr. Syed Mohammed Aatif, Adv.
Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv.
Mr. Syed Imtiaz Ali, Adv.
Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv.
Mr. M. Rambabu, Adv.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Divya Roy, AOR
Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR
Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR
Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation