SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Prakasha @ Prakash Gouda vs The State By Sub Inspector Of … on 17 April, 2017



Dated this the 17th day of April 2017
Criminal Petition No.100667/2017

1. Prakasha @ Prakash Gouda
S/O. Siddabasavana Gouda
Age:47 Years, Occ:Agriculturist
R/O. Kotturu Town,
Kudligi-Taluk, Ballari-Dt

2. Smt Bhagyamma,
W/O. Prakasha @ Prakash Gouda
Age: 40 Years, Occ: Housewife
R/O. Kotturu Town,
Kudligi-Taluk, Ballari-Dt. …Petitioners

(By Sri. Manjunatha G. Patil, Advocate)


The State By Sub Inspector Of Police
Kotturu Police Station, Kotturu
Ballari District.
Represented By SPP,
High Court Of Karnataka
Dharwad Bench At Dharwad. …Respondent

(By Sri. Praveen K.Uppar, HCGP)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C., seeking to release them on bail in the event of
their arrest in Crime No.23 Of 2017 of Kotturu Police

Station Kotturu, Ballari-District for offences punishable
under Sections, 498A, 504, 506, 306 read with 34 of IPC
for petitioners are concerned in the above case.

This petition coming on for Orders this day, the
Court, made the following:


This petition is filed by the petitioners/accused

Nos.1 and 2 under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, seeking anticipatory bail, to direct the

respondent Police to release them on bail in the event of

their arrest of the alleged offences punishable under

Sections 498A, 504, 506, 306 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code registered in respondent Police Station

Crime No.23/2017.

2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 and also

the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for

the respondent-State.

3. I have perused the grounds urged in the bail

petition, FIR, complaint and other materials produced

along with the petition. So also, I have perused the order

passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ballari, rejecting

the bail application filed by the petitioners

4. Looking to the averments made in the complaint,

there are allegations even as against the present

petitioners that they were ill-treating and harassing the

deceased, and they were abusing the deceased with filthy

language. As submitted by the learned High Court

Government Pleader, the matter is still under investigation.

Therefore, at this stage, it is not proper for this Court to

allow this petition and grant anticipatory bail.

Without going into the merits of the case and

keeping all the contentions of the petitioners open, this

petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file

a petition, if so desired, after completion of the

investigation and filing of the chargesheet.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation