SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pramod Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 November, 2017

(Pramod Sharma Vs. State of M.P.)

Shri Sushil Goswami, Advocate for the applicant.
Smt. Sangeeta Pachouri, Public Prosecutor for the

Case Diary is perused.

Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.
This is first application under section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.

Applicant apprehends arrest in connection with Crime
No.98/2017 registered at Police Station Pathari, District Vidisha for
the offences punishable under sections 509, 506 and 354 of the

Prosecution story, in short, is that on 7/10/17, when
complainant was going to her home from Railway Station, applicant
asked her to live with him as his keep and threatened her with life.
On complainant’s refusal, he went away and when she reached her
home, she again found that applicant was present there. When
she was opening the lock, he again called the complainant her
mistress and asked to come inside. The incident was witnessed by
Neela Ram Vishwakarma and Prakash Balotia.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has
been falsely implicated in the case. Initially offences under
sections 506 and 509, IPC were registered against the applicant
and the same being bailable, he was released on bail. Later,
offence under section 354, IPC has been enhanced. Complainant
is niece of applicant, aged about 45-50 years and land dispute
prevails between them. It is also submitted that applicant had
lodged a complaint against the concerned TI on CM helpline,
enraged whereof the said TI got him beaten by some persons and
(Pramod Sharma Vs. State of M.P.)

implicated him in false cases. In support, learned counsel has
referred to the CM helpline receipt and various other documents.
With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for anticipatory bail is

In response, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail
application and prays for its rejection.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the
case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I
deem it appropriate to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the

It is hereby directed that in the event of arrest of applicant
namely Pramod Sharma, he shall be released on bail on his
furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand
only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction
of Arresting Authority.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the
following conditions by applicant:-

1. He will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond
executed by him;

2. He will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may

3. He will not indulge in extending inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the
Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. He shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of
which he is accused;

5. He will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6. He will not leave India without previous permission of the trial
Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

C.C. as per rules.


Digitally signed by ANAND

S., postalCode474011,
stMadhya Pradesh,


ee7, cnANAND
Date: 2017.11.24 17:16:30

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation