CRAN 4217 of 2019
Ct. No. 32
CRR 1902 of 2016
In the matter of:- Prativa Pradhan Ors. … petitioners
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly,
Mr. Dipanjan Dutt.
…for the petitioners.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh,
Mr. Bitasok Banerjee.
…for the State.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on
Despite service, no one appears on behalf of the private opposite
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that a
date may be fixed for final hearing of the case.
Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits as follows. This case was instituted by the wife under Section
498A of the Penal Code against her in-laws except her husband. Actually,
there is a property dispute between her husband and her in-laws, which
prompted her to file a false case. The interim order of stay granted earlier
was extended from time to time.
Let the matter appear as a ‘Contested Application’ two weeks
The interim order of stay granted earlier and extended from time
to time shall remain extended for a period of five weeks from this date.
The parties shall be at liberty to pray for extension or modification
or vacating of the interim order upon notice to the other side.
The State is directed to produce the case diary on the next date
The petitioners shall intimate the next date of hearing to the
private opposite party by speed post with acknowledgment due, within a
week and file an affidavit of service to that effect on the next date of hearing.
The application being CRAN 4217 of 2019 is disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)