SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Praveen Kumar Singh @ Pinku And 3 … vs State Of Up And Another on 13 August, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 70

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 31080 of 2019

Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh @ Pinku And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Suraj Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the impugned chargesheet No.1/2019 dated 28.01.2019 arising out of Case Crime No.380 of 2018, cognizance order dated 03.07.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1077 of 2019 (SectionState vs. Praveen Kumar @ Pinku and others), under Sections 323, Section506, Section354, Section377, Section498A I.P.C. Section 3/Section4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Sarnath, District – Varanasi, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII Varanasi.

The learned counsel for the applicants after advancing his arguments at some length, gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned chargesheet No.1/2019 dated 28.01.2019, cognizance order dated 03.07.2019 and criminal proceedings against the applicants and requested to grant some protection, so that applicants may surrender before the court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application and prayed that a direction be issued to the courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.

Considering the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case applicants appear before the concerned court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with settled law laid down by the Seven Judges’ decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437 Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

For the period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

With the above observations, this application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

Order Date :- 13.8.2019

SKD

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation