SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Praveen.P.Nair vs State Of Kerala on 31 October, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941

BAIL APPL.NO.7624 OF 2019

CRIME NO.1770/2019 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONER:

PRAVEEN.P.NAIR, AGED 27 YEARS,
S/O.PREMKUMAR, POOVADIYIL, MANNAR,
ALAPPUZHA DIST.-690105.

BY ADVS.
SRI.P.R.HARIKUMAR, SRI.ANANTHU S .HARI

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2 INSPECTOR,
SHO, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DIST.-688001.

3 ANJANA.S.,
AGED 26 YEARS, D/O.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR,
MURALEEBHAVANAM, PELA MURI, KANNAMANGALAM,
MAVELIKARA-690106.

SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
————————————-
B.A. No. 7624 of 2019
————————————-
Dated this the 31st day of October, 2019

ORDER

The petitioner herein has been arrayed as accused

No.1 among the 3 accused in the instant Crime No.1770/2019 of

Mannar Police Station, which has been registered for offences

punishable under Secs.294(b), 323, 324 498A of the SectionIPC, on

the basis of FIS given by the lady defacto complainant on

10.9.2019 at about 11.10 pm in respect of the alleged incident

which has happened on 7.9.2019 . The lady defacto complainant

in this case is the wife of the petitioner (A1). A2 and A3 are the

mother and father respectively of the petitioner (A1).

2. The prosecution case in short is that, after the

marriage of the abovesaid spouses, the petitioners have treated

the lady defacto complainant with cruelty and harassment and

they always complained that she had bring only lesser dowry and

she should bring more dowry, and that they used to frequently

abuse her using foul language, and thereby the petitioners have

committed the abovesaid offences.

B.A. No. 7624 of 2019

..3..

3. Sri.Amjad Ali, learned Prosecutor would now submit on

the basis of instructions of the Investigating Officer concerned that

the Investigating Officer has already completed the investigation in

respect to the instant crime in its entirety and the final

report/charge sheet has also been duly filed before the JFCM,

Chengannur on 30.9.2019, and therefore now the apprehension of

the petitioner that he would be arrested in relation to the instant

crime is unfounded, and that it is for the petitioner to seek bail

from the competent court below concerned as and when he

receives summons consequent to the cognizance being taken by the

said Court.

4. The abovesaid submission made on behalf of the

prosecution agency is recorded. It is for the petitioner to work out

his remedies in the manner known to law.

With the said liberty, the above Bail Application will

stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
JUDGE
MMG

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation