IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941
BAIL APPL.NO.7624 OF 2019
CRIME NO.1770/2019 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PRAVEEN.P.NAIR, AGED 27 YEARS,
S/O.PREMKUMAR, POOVADIYIL, MANNAR,
SRI.P.R.HARIKUMAR, SRI.ANANTHU S .HARI
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
SHO, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DIST.-688001.
AGED 26 YEARS, D/O.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR,
MURALEEBHAVANAM, PELA MURI, KANNAMANGALAM,
SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
B.A. No. 7624 of 2019
Dated this the 31st day of October, 2019
The petitioner herein has been arrayed as accused
No.1 among the 3 accused in the instant Crime No.1770/2019 of
Mannar Police Station, which has been registered for offences
punishable under Secs.294(b), 323, 324 498A of the SectionIPC, on
the basis of FIS given by the lady defacto complainant on
10.9.2019 at about 11.10 pm in respect of the alleged incident
which has happened on 7.9.2019 . The lady defacto complainant
in this case is the wife of the petitioner (A1). A2 and A3 are the
mother and father respectively of the petitioner (A1).
2. The prosecution case in short is that, after the
marriage of the abovesaid spouses, the petitioners have treated
the lady defacto complainant with cruelty and harassment and
they always complained that she had bring only lesser dowry and
she should bring more dowry, and that they used to frequently
abuse her using foul language, and thereby the petitioners have
committed the abovesaid offences.
B.A. No. 7624 of 2019
3. Sri.Amjad Ali, learned Prosecutor would now submit on
the basis of instructions of the Investigating Officer concerned that
the Investigating Officer has already completed the investigation in
respect to the instant crime in its entirety and the final
report/charge sheet has also been duly filed before the JFCM,
Chengannur on 30.9.2019, and therefore now the apprehension of
the petitioner that he would be arrested in relation to the instant
crime is unfounded, and that it is for the petitioner to seek bail
from the competent court below concerned as and when he
receives summons consequent to the cognizance being taken by the
4. The abovesaid submission made on behalf of the
prosecution agency is recorded. It is for the petitioner to work out
his remedies in the manner known to law.
With the said liberty, the above Bail Application will
stand disposed of.