SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pravesh Singh & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 20 July, 2018

$~53
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 20.07.2018
+ CRL.M.C. 3551/2018
PRAVESH SINGH ORS ….. Petitioners

versus

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ANR….. Respondents

Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the
State with ASI Surinder Singh, P.S.Uttam Nagar.
Mr.Rajinder Verma, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

20.07.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 28082/2018(exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 3551/2018

1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.475 of 2015 under
Sections 498A/406 IPC, Police Station: Uttam Nagar, based on a
settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a
matrimonial discord.

CRL.M.C. 3551/2018 Page 1 of 3

2. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 3,10,000/- was agreed
to be paid to respondent no. 2. The amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- has
already been paid to respondent no. 2. The balance amount of
Rs.1,10,000/- has been paid by way of Demand draft No.003288 dated
06.07.2018 drawn on State Bank of India.

3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have
settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by
mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 06.03.2018 has been
passed. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had
entered into the settlement before the Family Court, Dwarka Courts,
New Delhi dated 31.08.2017.

4. Learned counsels for the parties inform that other disputes
between the parties have also been resolved and proceedings have
been concluded on the basis of the subject settlement.

5. Respondent no. 2 who is present in court in person and
represented by counsel, is identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2
submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is
agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal
charges against the petitioners any further.

6. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and
respondent no. 2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been
settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in

CRL.M.C. 3551/2018 Page 2 of 3
futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the
parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of
justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to
quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating
there from.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.475 of
2015 under Sections 498A/406 IPC, Police Station: Uttam Nagar, and
the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly
quashed.

8. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JULY 20, 2018
rk

CRL.M.C. 3551/2018 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation