IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
133
CR No.8263 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision: 20.02.2019
Preetam Singh …… Petitioner
Versus
Bindu Devi …… Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:- Mr. Manoj Pundir, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate
for the respondent.
*****
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (ORAL)
Husband is in the revision petition against the order passed by
the Additional District Judge under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1956 determining the amount of maintenance pendente lite.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
present revision petition has been rendered infructuous as the parties have
entered into a settlement and pursuant thereto, a decree for divorce has
already been granted.
Dismissed as infrcutuous.
( ANIL KSHETARPAL )
20.02.2019 JUDGE
Dinesh Bansal
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable Yes / No
1 of 1
10-03-2019 15:35:31 :::