IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46165 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1299 Year- 2013 Thana -BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District-
BHOJPUR
Prem Shankar Singh Son of Late Rup Narayan Singh, Residence o f Village –
Bihita, P.S. – Imadpur, District – Bhojpur.
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Son of Late Dhanpath Chaubey, Residence o f
Village – Bihita, P.S. – Imadpur, District – Bhojpur.
…. …. Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar 2, APP
For Opp. Party No. 2 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ojha, Advocate
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 02-05-2018
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing an order dated 12.12.2013
passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ara, in Complaint Case
No. 1299C/2013 Trial No. 3763/2015, whereby cognizance for
offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken.
Inter alia, contending that ingredients necessary for
constituting an offence under Section 406, IPC is not made out this
application has been filed by the petitioner.
The complainant and the applicant herein entered into a
contractual agreement by way of a partnership deed dated
18.09.2006 and according to the partnership deed they were to
Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.46165 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018
2/3
execute jointly a work entrusted by the Government and
consideration for execution of the work was Rs.17 lakhs. It is said
that the work was executed in accordance with the agreement but
after payment was made for the work in question, the applicant kept
the entire consideration amount and did not transfer the amount
which was required to be paid to the complainant as his share. It is
alleged that initially a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- lakhs was paid,
thereafter a sum of Rs.3 lakhs was paid and in third installment a
sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was paid. As per the terms and condition of the
contract. the amount was to be kept in the joint account of the firm
and the amount was to be distributed as per the contract according to
which the complainant was to receive Rs. 9 lakhs. It is alleged that
fraudulently the applicant kept the entire amount, did not deposit the
same to the joint account and, therefore, committed criminal breach
of trust. It is further alleged that he has taken out the entire amount
of Rs.17 lakhs and deprived the complainant of his share to the tune
of Rs.9 lakhs.
Taking note of all the factors and going through the
several documents signed by both parties acknowledging the debts
and the material available on record with regard to the partnership
deed in question the complaint has been registered and the learned
court below has taken cognizance of the offence.
Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.46165 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018
3/3
Learned counsel for the parties have been heard and after
perusal of the complaint and the nature of allegations levelled
against the applicant and the statement recorded by the complainant
it is clear that allegations are with regard to breach of trust in the
matter of payment of consideration money received after execution
of the contractual work as per the terms and conditions of the
agreement and at this stage in a proceeding under Section 482 Cr.PC
this Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere into the matter.
Accordingly, finding no ground to make any indulgence
into the matter the application stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
mrl./-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 03.05.2018
Transmission 03.05.2018
Date