SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pritam And Others vs State Of Haryana on 18 May, 2018


Date of decision: 18.05.2018

Pritam and others


State of Haryana


Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate,
for the petitioners.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.



This Court was pleased to pass the following order on

09.03.2018 :-

“This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438
Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR
No.1075 dated 20.11.2017, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 506 of
Indian Penal Code (Sections 148, 325 308 IPC added later on
and Section 354 IPC deleted), registered at Police Station Sadar
Gurugram, District Gurugram.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the
petitioners herein had earlier been granted interim anticipatory
bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram for offences
punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 354, 506, 325 of
Indian Penal Code, on the same set of allegations and medical
available. However, later on Section 308 of Indian Penal Code has
been added, while deleting Section 354 of Indian Penal Code. It is
argued that the petitioners herein have already joined the
investigation under the sections invoked earlier. It is submitted that
the sentence under the newly added Section 308 IPC would be

1 of 2
20-05-2018 05:48:01 :::
CRM-M-9631-2018 -2-

same, as under Section 325 IPC. It is also contended that co-
accused Ravinder has already been granted interim anticipatory
bail by this court in CRM-M-1247 of 2018 and the petitioners
herein are ready to cooperate and join the investigation.

Notice of motion for 18.04.2018.

To be heard along with CRM-M-1247-2018.

Meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to join the
investigation within a period of one week and on their doing so, the
petitioners be released on interim bail subject to their furnishing
personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of
Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioners shall
continue to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so
and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438
(2) Cr.P.C. “

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners

have joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the factum

of joining investigation by the petitioners.

Since the petitioners have joined the investigation, the petition

is allowed and interim order dated 09.03.2018 is hereby made absolute

subject to the condition that the petitioners will not tamper with evidence or

hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the

Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2)


18.05.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR)
Satyawan JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.
Whether reportable No.

2 of 2
20-05-2018 05:48:02 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation