SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pritam Munsi @ Munshi & Ors vs Unknown on 8 July, 2019

1

08.07.2019

.

127.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 5825 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04.7.2019 in connection
with Beliaghata P.S. Case No.21 dated 25.01.2019 under Sections
498A/Section406/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and Section4 of
the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Pritam Munsi @ Munshi Ors.

… Petitioners.

Mr. Amal Kr. Banerjee.

…for the Petitioners.

Ms. Kakali Chatterjee.

…..for the State.

Liberty to correct the cause title of the petition.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the dispute

arose out of a matrimonial discord and stridhan articles have been

returned to the de-facto complainant.

Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail and submits that the incident occurred within

two months of marriage.

We have considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the nature of allegations in the light of the aforesaid
2

submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, we are of the

opinion that though custodial interrogation of the petitioners may

not be necessary, petitioners require to co-operate with the

investigation in accordance with law.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner viz., Pritam Munsi @ Munshi, Purna Chandra Munsi @

Munshi, Rama Munsi @ Munshi and Shubham @ Shuvam Munsi

@ Munshi shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, subject to

the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 and subject to further condition that the

petitioner No.1 shall meet the investigating officer once in a week

until further orders and on further condition that the petitioners

shall appear before the trial court and pray for regular bail within

four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation