pmw 1/2 wp-3023, 3024.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.3023 OF 2016

Pritam Pradip Patkar Anr. …Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra Anr. …Respondents

WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3024 OF 2016

Pradip Kashinath Patkar Ors. …Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra Anr. …Respondents

—-
Mr. Vishal Patil for the Petitioners.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent-State.
—-

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 4th NOVEMBER 2019.

P.C.:

1 Heard the learned counsel. The Respondent No.2 – wife has

filed the proceedings under sections 498A, 406, 323, 506 r/w 34 of SectionIPC and
on that basis charge sheet has been filed and Criminal Case No.147 of 2016
has been registered.

2 The learned counsel for the petitioner husband in Writ Petition
No.3023 of 2016 and for in laws in other petition submits that in earlier
proceedings the respondent – wife has made some statements and those
statements run contrary to FIR.

::: Uploaded on – 06/11/2019 06/11/2019 20:52:15 :::
pmw 2/2 wp-3023, 3024.16.doc

3 The learned APP appearing for State submits that grievance of

this nature can be looked into by the trial Court.

4 Whether statements are contrary, what is the relevance of such
statements are aspects required to be looked into by the trial Court.

5 We are therefore not inclined to make any observation in that
respect in present jurisdiction.

6 Liberty to petitioners to take steps as are open to them in law
are kept open. Petitions are disposed of accordingly.

(SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

::: Uploaded on – 06/11/2019 06/11/2019 20:52:15 :::