SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Priyanka Rani @ Neha Gupta vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal … on 29 November, 2023

Patna High Court

Priyanka Rani @ Neha Gupta vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal … on 29 November, 2023

Author: Anil Kumar Sinha

Bench: Anil Kumar Sinha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1379 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Gaya

PRIYANKA RANI @ NEHA GUPTA WIFE OF SHRI GAURAV GUPTA,
D/O SHEKHAR KUMAR SAHA R/O MOHALLA- A.N. ROAD,
MURARPUR, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTT.- GAYA, BIHAR

… … Petitioner/s
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA
3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA, BIHAR
4. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTT.-GAYA
5. THE S.H.O. KOTWALI P.S., DISTT.- GAYA
6. MANOJ KUMAR SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD
PRESENTLY POSTED AS ASP, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, PATNA,
BIHAR, RESIDENT OF 401 4TH FLOOR MAHAVIR ENCLAVE NEAR
SHYAMA APARTMENT, LOHIA PATH, JAGDEV PATH, RUKANPURA,
PATNA, BIHAR- 800014
7. ASI REKHA KUMARI AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT POSTED AT
KOTWALI P.S.- GAYA, BIHAR
8. ASI SANJAY KUMAR AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT POSTED AT
KOTWALI P.S., GAYA, BIHAR
9. SHRI BAIJU GUPTA SON OF SHRI FUNNU LAL R/O GAYATRI
COMPLEX ABOVE JANA SMALL F.M. FINANCIAL BANK,
LAHARIYA TOLA KOTWALI P.S., GAYA, BIHAR- 823001
10. SMT. GAYATRI DEVI WIFE OF SHRI BAIJU PRASAD GUPTA R/O
GAYATRI COMPLEX ABOVE JANA SMALL F.M. FINANCIAL BANK,
LAHARIYA TOLA KOTWALI P.S., GAYA, BIHAR- 823001
11. SHRI VARUN KUMAR SON OF SHRI BAIJU PRASAD GUPTA R/O
GAYATRI COMPLEX ABOVE JANA SMALL F.M. FINANCIAL BANK,
LAHARIYA TOLA KOTWALI P.S., GAYA, BIHAR- 823001

… … Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kr. Arya

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar

For the Respondent No. 9 to 11: Mr. Rana Vikram Singh

For the Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
2/13

For the Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Arun Kumar No. 1

For the Respondent No. 7 : Mr. S. Sinha

For the State : Mr. Deepak Kumar AC to GP 4

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 29-11-2023

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ application for

the following reliefs:

i) For direction to the Respondent No. 2 to
appoint an independent agency i.e. C.B.I. in view of law
laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of 1995
Cri.L.J.3612 for the purpose of registration of prosecution
against the Respondents No. 6 to 11 for the offences
punishable under Section 188, 191, 193, 203, 204, 211,
219 of I.P.C. read with Sections 120B and 34 of the I.P.C.
and to proceed against them in accordance with law.
ii) For direction to the Respondent No. 2 for
initiating enquiry against the Respondent No. 6 to 8 in the
matter of violation of provisions of law, and to take action
against them.
iii) For direction to the Respondent No. 1 to file
and initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents
police officers for disobeying the law laid down by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and this Hon’ble Court
from time to time in the matter.
iv) For direction to the Respondent No. 2 to
immediate suspend the Respondents No. 6 to 8 for not
performing their duties in the manner required;
v) Pass appropriate directions to the Home
Ministry / Respondent No. 1 to frame rules so as to avoid
such false implications of citizens at the hands of corrupt
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
3/13

criminal minded police personnels.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present writ

application as brought by the petitioner is that on 09.12.2015 the

petitioner was married as per Hindu rites and rituals to one

Gaurav Kumar, who is the son of respondent nos. 9 10. The

petitioner alleges that at the matrimonial home she was

subjected to torture, humiliation and harassment mentally and

physically at the hands of her husband, who was involved in

gambling, drinking liquor and having illicit relation with other

woman, which would be evident from the complaint filed by the

respondent no. 9 against her son. In the hope of reform of the

conduct and behaviour of her husband, the petitioner tried her

best to stay in her matrimonial home and during the course of

her stay she gave birth to a female child on 13.10.2017. After

birth of female child torture, harassment and humiliation upon

the petitioner by her in-laws aggravated and the life of the

petitioner became hell. She stated that at the instance of the

respondent no. 6 (Nandoi of the petitioner), who is posted as

A.S.P. (Vigilance Department, Patna) some police personnel

without any lady constable and without following the procedure

of law on 03.09.2019 at about 11:00 P.M. broke open the door

where the petitioner along with her minor daughter was residing
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
4/13

(matrimonial home). The Kotwali Police forcibly took away one

09 year old boy namely, Dheeraj Kumar, who is the son of the

maid working in the matrimonial home namely Shakuntala

Devi. Accordingly, an F.I.R. bearing Kotwali P.S. Case No. 406

of 2019 under Sections 342 / 323 / 370 / 370 (a) / 374 / 353 of

the I.P.C., Section 75 / 79 of the J.J. Act and Section 14 (a) of

the Child and Adolescent Labour Act was lodged against the

petitioner.

3. The petitioner contends that in order to compel her to

withdraw all cases filed by her against her in-laws, the

respondent nos. 6 to 11 hatched a conspiracy and in execution of

the same the boy Dheeraj was abducted by Kotwali Police so

that petitioner and her family members can be dragged in a false

and frivolous case. The petitioner relies upon Annexure P-4 i.e.

conversation between local Kotwali Police and the respondent

no. 6 in support of her allegation. The mother of the abducted

child moved an application for custody of her son before the

C.J.M., Gaya in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 406 of 2019 wherein the

court on 04.10.2019 directed the I.O. to release the child in

favour of the mother. The petitioner had made an application on

09.10.2019

regarding the said incident to S.S.P., Gaya. She filed

several representations and complaints before various
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
5/13

authorities which are annexed at Annexures-12 to 19 of this writ

application. There are series of litigations between the petitioner

and private respondents, which are mentioned hereinbelow:-

(i) Petitioner on 24.10.2018 filed D.V. Case No.
21 of 2018 before the A.C.J.M., Patna City alleging
torture and harassment against her in-laws.

(ii) Petitioner on 15.12.2018 lodged an F.I.R.
bearing Kotwali P.S. Case No. 573 of 2018 under
Section 498A, 341, 323, 504, 313 34 of the I.P.C. and
Section 3 / 4 of the D.P. Act against her in laws.

(iii) S.D.M., Sadar Gaya issued letter bearing no.
1316 / legal dated 20.12.2018 with regard to incident
dated 18.12.2018 when the petitioner went to her
matrimonial home but same was locked from outside.
With the help of Kotwali Police she was facilitated entry.

(iv) Respondent no. 9, who is the father-in-law of
the petitioner filed Cr.W.J.C. No. 3297 / 2018 in order to
get the petitioner evicted from the matrimonial home,
which was dismissed vide order dated 08.01.2020.

(v) Petitioner on 30th March 2019 filed one
Cr.W.J.C. No. 576 of 2019 which was allowed and
S.H.O. of Kotwali Police Station Gaya was directed to
provide protection to the petitioner and her daughter so
that her in-laws may not forcibly evict them from the
house where they are presently living.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when

the respondent nos. 6 to 11 could not succeed in their objective

to get the petitioner evicted from matrimonial home, they
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
6/13

hatched another conspiracy for implicating the petitioner in a

false frivolous case in order to get her evicted from matrimonial

home and also to pressurize her to withdraw all the cases which

would be evident from the conversation (Annexure P-7) along

with the transcript. He further submits that the respondent no. 7

i.e. A.S.I. Rekha Kumari along with with some police personnel

visited the shop of the father of the petitioner in connection with

Kotwali P.S. Case No. 406 / 2019 and abused her brother in

public view in order to degrade and lower down the dignity and

reputation of the family members of the petitioner. The in-laws

of the petitioner falsely implicated her in another F.I.R. bearing

Kotwali P.S. Case No. 179 of 2020 registered under Sections

342, 323, 370, 370(a), 374 of the I.P.C. and Section 75 / 79 of

the Juvenile Justice Act in conspiracy with local police of

Kotwali Police Station at the instance of the respondent no. 6 by

managing and manipulating a poor girl namely Nahida, who had

leveled derogatory and defamatory allegation against the

petitioner. Charge sheet in the said F.I.R. has been filed on the

basis of perfunctory investigation at the behest of the respondent

no. 6. The C.C.T.V. footage installed at the house of the

petitioner and nearby house has not been taken into

consideration before submission of charge sheet. It has further
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
7/13

been submitted that the respondent no. 11 in order to harass and

humiliate the petitioner made a complaint before the District

Grievance Redressal Officer, Gaya for cancelling the drug

license of the petitioner, which was the only source of her

income and the drug license of the petitioner has been cancelled

vide order dated 04.07.2022 by the Assistant Drug Controller,

Gaya. The petitioner is having a daughter aged about 05 years

who goes to school but her studies are being affected because

the petitioner has to attend court cases accompanying her

daughter. The future and career of her daughter are at stake

because the in-laws of the petitioner are influential persons of

the society and are successfully managing Police Department

and also able to manage the lower judiciary.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the

private respondents argued that present writ application has

been filed by suppressing vital and material facts from this

court. This court vide its order dated 06.12.2022 directed the

S.S.P., Gaya to review all the cases after giving opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner and to take appropriate view of the

matter. He further submits that a quashing application was filed

by the respondent nos. 9, 10 11 bearing Cr. Misc. No. 59895 /

2021 for quashing of the order of cognizance passed by C.J.M.,
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
8/13

Gaya under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498A I.P.C. and Section ¾

of the Dowry Prohibition Act. By order dated 13.10.2022 a

Bench of this court stayed further proceedings of Kotwali P.S.

Case No. 573 of 2018. The opposite party no. 2 therein i.e. the

petitioner filed “vakalatnama” on 07.11.2022 and counter

affidavit on 17.11.2022 in the quashing application filed by the

private respondents. On 06.12.2022 when the present writ

application was taken up for hearing, the petitioner had the

knowledge about the stay order dated 13.10.2022 passed by this

court in Cr. Misc. No. 59895 / 2021 but this court was not

informed about the same. This amounts to deliberate

suppression of vital information from the court.

6. The petitioner is in the habit of harassing the

respondents in one way or the other. She has already filed

Domestic Violence Case No. 21 of 2018, which is pending

before learned A.C.J.M., Patna City. Miscellaneous Case No. 25

of 2019 for maintenance has also been filed by the petitioner,

which is pending before the learned Family Court, Gaya. In the

said Miscellaneous Case interim maintenance of Rs. 18,000/-

per month has been awarded. Defamation Case No. 1261 of

2022 has also been filed by the petitioner and is pending before

learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya. The husband of the
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
9/13

petitioner, who has surprisingly not been made respondent in the

present writ application has filed Matrimonial (Divorce) Case

No. 1405 of 2019 in which the petitioner has appeared and

proceeding is going on.

7. Learned counsel further submits that the audio is not a

trustworthy evidence. The petitioner has not submitted

certificate under Section 65B of the I.T.Act. Therefore, unless

authenticity and veracity of the alleged audio is tested, the same

cannot be a ground for proceeding against the private

respondents. Even the transcript of the said audio does not

prima facie show the complicity of the respondent nos. 6 in any

manner. Hence, the allegation is baseless and mala fide act of

the petitioner. He also submits that the principle of natural

justice provides for hearing of both the parties i.e. petitioner and

private respondents in order to ascertain the veracity and

truthfulness of the contents of the transcript of the alleged audio

but the petitioner has misrepresented before the Police and the

Police has committed illegality by not noticing the private

respondents while considering the fake script of the alleged

audio. All the matters were before the learned court below, but

the learned court below did not take cognizance of offences and

did not summon the respondent no. 6. Being infuriated by non
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
10/13

summoning of the private respondent no. 6, the petitioner has

devised a new ploy to implicate the private respondents

including the respondent no. 6. The petitioner has not made out

a case for exercise of writ jurisdiction of this court. The private

respondents are made party malafidely in order to extract

personnel gains. The writ petitioner is filing many frivolous

cases against the private respondents on one pretext or the other.

The present case is an example of raking up issues which are

more than three years old and all matters are pending

consideration before different learned courts below. In the name

of review as per order dated 06.12.2022 the police authority is

harassing the private respondents. Accordingly, the Police

authorities may be directed not to harass the private

respondents.

8. Learned counsel for the State referring to the counter

affidavit submits that pursuant to the order dated 06.12.2022

police reviewed the cases i.e. Kotwali P.S. Case No. 573 / 2018,

Kotwali P.S. Case No. 406 / 2019 and Kotwali P.S. Case No.

179 of 2020. In course of review of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 573

of 2018 the informant and her brother were called and detailed

statement of the informant was taken. Since the investigation of

this case was closed, directions have been given to conduct
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
11/13

further investigation under Section 173 (8) Cr.P.C. Further the

S.H.O., Kotwali Police Station has been directed to conduct

detailed investigation from the concerned doctor on the

allegation of the informant that abortion was done without her

consent and submit a report in this regard. Regarding Kotwali

P.S. Case No. 406 of 2019 instituted by the Labour Enforcement

Officer, City Gaya against the petitioner under Sections 342,

323, 370(A), 374 , 353 I.P.C. and Section 14(A) of the Child

Labour Act and Section 75 / 19 of the Juvenile Justice Act, it has

been submitted that upon investigation and supervision, the S.P.,

Gaya found the case true (report- R/3) and subsequently I.G.,

Magadh Range, Gaya directed to submit charge sheet against

the petitioner -Neha Gupta, Manorma Devi and Shekhar Kumar

Sah. In course of review direction has been given to get the

statement of Dheeraj Kumar [victim] and her mother recorded

under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and also to obtain complete injury

report of the victim.

9. With regard to the status of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 179

of 2020 directions have been given to conduct further

investigation under Section 173 (8) of the Cr.P.C. On

22.01.2023 statement of the writ petitioner was recorded

through video conferencing during which she claimed to have
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
12/13

some call recordings and C.C.T.V. footage. Accordingly, she has

been advised to submit all such evidences on which she relied.

S.H.O., Kotwali Police Station has been directed to seize audio

and video clip in accordance with law and get the same

examined by Forensic Science Laboratory, Patna. Learned

counsel further submits that latest status of Kotwali P.S. Case

No. 573 of 2018 , Kotwali P.S. Case No. 406 of 2019 and

Kotwali P.S. Case No. 179 of 2020 have been brought on record

by way of counter affidavit of the respondent no. 4.

10. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have

gone through the materials produced by them. The petitioner has

prayed for a direction to the D.G.P., Patna to appoint an

independent agency i.e. C.B.I. for initiating prosecution against

the respondent nos. 6 to 11 for their act of omission and

commission and take action against them. Admittedly both the

parties are family members making allegations and counter

allegations. Several cases have been lodged by both the parties

against each other. This court on 06.12.2022 directed the S.S.P.,

Gaya to review all the pending cases and in pursuance thereof

report has been submitted by S.S.P., Gaya who after hearing the

petitioner and her brother issued necessary direction for further

investigation in the matter and also to get the audio / video clip
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1379 of 2022 dt.29-11-2023
13/13

examined by the Forensic Science Laboratory, Patna.

11. Taking into consideration the attending facts and the

fact that higher Police authority is supervising the case and has

issued necessary directions for further investigation, in my

opinion, the petitioner is not entitled to be given the reliefs as

prayed for in the writ application.

12. Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-AFR
AFR/NAFR AFR
CAV DATE 21-09-2023
Uploading Date 30-11-2023
Transmission Date NA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation