SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Prohibition Act vs In The Matter Of: Anahara Bhangi @ … on 30 January, 2018


C.R.M. 789 of 2018

     30.01.2018 In the matter of : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
     Ct. No. 28 the  Code  of  Criminal  Procedure  filed  on  25.01.2018  in  connection  with
Chandrakona  P.S.  Case  No.  337  of  2017  dated  09.12.2017  under  sections
498A/302/506/34  of  the  Indian  Penal  Code  and  sections  3/4  of  the  Dowry
Prohibition Act.


In the matter of: Anahara Bhangi @ Anahar Khatun  Ors.

                                            … … petitioners.

Mr. Suman Das Adhikary
  … … for the petitioners.

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Ld. P.P.,
Ms. Amita Gaur
… … for the State.

It is submitted on behalf  of  the  petitioners  that  the  victim  suffered

accidental  fall  and  it  is  further  submitted  that  the  petitioners  have  been

falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned  counsel  appearing  for  the  State  opposes  the  prayer  for

anticipatory bail.

We  have  considered  the  materials  in  the  case  diary  and  we  find

from  the  medical  papers  that  the  victim  had  suffered  injury  due  to

accidental fall.

In  view  of  the  aforesaid  facts  and  bearing  in  mind  the  extent  of

complicity  of  the  petitioners  in  the  alleged  crime,  we  are  of  the  opinion

that they may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we  direct  that  in  the  event  of  arrest  the  petitioners  shall

be  released  on  bail  upon  furnishing  a  bond  of  Rs.10,000/‐  each  with  two

sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

also  subject  to  the  conditions  as  laid  down  under  Section  438(2)  of  the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

   (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)                                                (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation