SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Purnima Narginary @ Mangal Chandi vs The State Of West Bengal on 9 October, 2018


Serial No.287(M/L).

October 9, 2018.

CRM 8106 of 2018

In Re. An application for anticipatory bail under
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the matter of:

Purnima Narginary @ Mangal Chandi


The State of West Bengal

Mr Arnab Saha
… for the petitioner.

Mr Rudradipta Nandy
… for the State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with
Kumargram Police Station Case No.221 of 2017 dated November 3,
2017 under Sections 498A/304B of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is the wife of a brother of the victim’s husband.
The petitioner claims complete innocence.

The State refers to the case diary and says that the prayer of
the father-in-law has recently been rejected by this court.

Considering the statement of some of the witnesses, it does
not appear that the petitioner has been named by many of them.
Further, there is no eyewitness to the incident which led to the
death of the victim and the petitioner’s involvement in such incident
does not come out from the case diary.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner is directed to
be released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five

Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local, to the
satisfaction of the arresting officer, subject to the conditions laid
down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In
addition, the petitioner will also report to the investigating officer at
such time and place as may be specified by the concerned police

The petition for anticipatory bail is disposed of on the
conditions indicated above.

A certified copy of this order be immediately made available to
the petitioner, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

( Sanjib Banerjee, J. )

( Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation