SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pushpender Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 21 August, 2019


CRM-M-22098 of 2019.
Decided on:- August 21, 2019.

Pushpender Kumar.

State of Haryana and another



Present:- Mr. Nipun Vashist, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, A.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Advocate
for respondent No.2-complainant.


Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for

quashing of FIR No.93 dated 16.03.2018 under Sections 323, 324, 377, 498-

A, 506 and 509 SectionIPC registered at Police Station Gurgaon City, Gurugram

(Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis

of compromise (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 15.05.2019 had directed the parties

to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court to get their respective

statements recorded with regard to compromise and the Court was directed to

send its report qua genuineness of the compromise.

1 of 4
01-09-2019 19:07:14 :::
CRM-M-22098 of 2019 -2-

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner as well as

respondent No.2-complainant have appeared before learned Judicial

Magistrate 1st Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded on

03.07.2019. On the basis of the statements so recorded by the parties, learned

Magistrate has submitted the report dated 08.08.2019 to the effect that the

matter has been voluntarily compromised between the parties and the

complainant has entered into a settlement with the accused person out of her

own volition and same is without any influence or coercion.

The FIR in question has been recorded on the basis of statement

of respondent No.2-complainant Pooja Rani. She has made a statement before

learned Magistrate in support of the compromise on 03.07.2019, wherein she

has specifically mentioned that she has no objection in case the FIR in

question is quashed as the matter has been compromised between the parties.

Reply by way of affidavit of Rajeev Kumar, HPS, Assistant

Commissioner of Police, City Gurugram filed on behalf of respondent No.1-

State in Court today, is taken on record.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jagdish Chander

states that the offence under Section 377 IPC has been deleted during the

course of investigation and the charges have been framed against the

petitioner under Sections 323, Section324, Section498-A, Section506 and Section509 IPC vide order dated

14.03.2019 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurugram.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant and learned

State counsel do not dispute the factum of compromise entered between the


2 of 4
01-09-2019 19:07:14 :::
CRM-M-22098 of 2019 -3-

In view of the above, continuation of the proceedings before the

trial Court in the instant FIR qua the petitioner shall be an abuse of the

process of law.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gold Quest International Private

Limited Versus State of Tamil Nadu and others 2014 (4) RCR (Criminal)

206 has held that the disputes which are substantially matrimonial in nature,

or the civil property disputes with criminal facets, if the parties have entered

into settlement, and it has become clear that there are no chances of

conviction, there is no illegality in quashing the proceedings under Section

482 Cr.P.C. read with SectionArticle 226 of the Constitution.

Thus, following the principles laid down by the Full Bench

judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of

Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others

(2012) 10 SCC 303 as well as the law laid down in Gold Quest International

Private Limited’s case (supra), the present petition is allowed and the FIR

No.93 dated 16.03.2018 under Sections 323, Section324, Section377, Section498-A, Section506 and Section509

IPC (Section 377 SectionIPC deleted later on) registered at Police Station Gurgaon

City, Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising

therefrom are quashed qua the petitioner on the basis of compromise

(Annexure P-2), however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be

paid by the petitioner to the Non-Government Organization (NGO), namely,

The Earth Saviours Foundation, Bandhwari Village, Gurgaon-Faridabad

3 of 4
01-09-2019 19:07:14 :::
CRM-M-22098 of 2019 -4-

Road, near TERI Golf Course, District Gurgaon within a period of one month

from today.

August 21, 2019 JUDGE
Yag Dutt

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes

Whether Reportable: No

4 of 4
01-09-2019 19:07:14 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation