IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
126
CR No.3342 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision: 16.08.2017
Raj Kumar …… Petitioner
Versus
Neelam …… Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:- Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate, for
Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*****
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (ORAL)
Husband is in revision petition against the order passed by
District Judge, Narnaul fixing maintenance pendente lite @ ` 7,000/- per
month.
It is not in dispute that the petitioner-husband is serving in
CRPF and his salary is more than ` 30,000/- per month. The District Judge
has fixed the maintenance only ` 7,000/-. Hence, there is no scope for
interference.
Revision petition is dismissed.
( ANIL KSHETARPAL )
16.08.2017 JUDGE
Dinesh Bansal
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable Yes / No
1 of 1
19-08-2017 15:19:57 :::