SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Raj Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 21 November, 2019

CRM-M-32478-2019 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

275 CRM-M-32478-2019
Date of Decision: 21.11.2019

Raj Singh and others …..Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another …..Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.

Present: None for the petitioners.

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, AAG, Punjab,
for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

****

HARI PAL VERMA , J.(Oral)

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for

quashing of FIR No.51 dated 05.10.2018 under Sections 498-A, Section406 IPC,

registered at Police Station Women, Bathinda (Annexure P-1) and all

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated

01.03.2019 (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 31.07.2019 had directed the parties

to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court to get their statements

recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the

genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before

learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bathinda and got their statements

1 of 3
::: Downloaded on – 08-12-2019 09:52:45 :::
CRM-M-32478-2019 2

recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has

submitted report dated 03.09.2019 to the effect that the compromise has

been effected between the parties is voluntarily, without any pressure or

coercion and is genuine one.

Though, today no one is present on behalf of respondent No.2-

victim, namely, Jaspreet Kaur, but no prejudice would be caused to her as

she has already made a statement with regard to compromise before the

learned Magistrate on 02.09.2019. The same is reproduced as under:-

“Stated that FIR No. 51 dated 05.10.2018, under Section
498A/Section406 IPC, Police Station Women Cell, Bathinda
was got registered by my father against the accused Raj
Singh, Shinderpal Kaur and Sandeep Singh R/o village
Gholia Khurd. Now with the intervention of relatives
and friends compromise has been effected with the
accused party and accused have filed a petition No.
CRM-M-32478-2019 before the Hon’ble High Court of
Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, for quashing the
above said FIR which is pending before the Hon’ble
High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, for
21.11.2019. I have no objection if the above said FIR be
quashed against the accused. I got recorded my
statement without any pressure and with my free will.”

Apart from above, a similar statement has also been made by

complainant-Raju Singh, who is father of victim-respondent No.2, whereby

he has shown no objection to the present FIR being quashed.

Learned State counsel has not disputed the factum of

compromise between the parties.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to

continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gold Quest International Private
2 of 3
08-12-2019 09:52:45 :::
CRM-M-32478-2019 3

Limited Versus State of Tamil Nadu and others-2014 (4) RCR (Criminal)

206 has held that when the disputes are substantially matrimonial in nature,

or are civil property disputes with criminal facets, if the parties enter into a

settlement, and it becomes clear that there are no chances of conviction,

there is no illegality in quashing the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

read with SectionArticle 226 of the Constitution of India.

Thus, following the principles laid down by the Full Bench

judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of

Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, as approved by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others

(2012) 10 SCC 303 also, in the light of Gold Quest International Private

Limited’s case (supra), this petition is allowed and FIR No.51 dated

05.10.2018 under Sections 498-A, Section406 IPC, registered at Police Station

Women, Bathinda (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 01.03.2019 (Annexure P-2) are

hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

November 21, 2019 (HARI PAL VERMA)
seema JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No

3 of 3
08-12-2019 09:52:45 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation