wp.996.16.36.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 996 OF 2016

Raja Pitchiah Konar …Petitioner
Versus
Mary Raja Konar Anr. …Respondents

Ms. Vandana for the Petitioner

Respondent No. 1 is present in-person

Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

MONDAY. 4Th MARCH 2019

P.C. :

1 In furtherance of Court orders dated 7 th December 2018

and 7th February 2019, respondent No. 1 has produced her Aadhar

Card. We have verified Aadhar Card with assistance of learned A.P.P.

It is reported that it is genuine.

2 Respondent No. 1 is also identified by petitioner.

3 Counsel for petitioner states that amount of Rs. 9 lakhs

and LIC amount of Rs. 1 lakh are to be received by respondent No. 1

and same are in deposit with Family Court.

SQ Pathan 1/2

::: Uploaded on – 05/03/2019 13/03/2019 07:39:14 :::
wp.996.16.36.doc

4 Respondent No. 1 has given her no objection for quashing

of RCC No.186/2011 and criminal case. The matters arise out of

matrimonial discord and Section 498A of Indian Penal Code.

5 As per Consent Terms, clause (8), the petitioner has to

return gold ear chain, gold engagement ring, child’s two gold rings and

one chain with pendent. The same are received by respondent No. 1

today in Court.

6 In view of her consent, we make rule absolute in terms of

prayer clause (a).

7 Needless to mention that respondent No. 1 can apply to

Family Court and withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner

there for her along with original LIC Policy.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2

::: Uploaded on – 05/03/2019 13/03/2019 07:39:14 :::