SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajat And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 18 October, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.76009 of 2018
Date of decision: 18th October, 2019

Rajat another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Amrik Narwal, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana
for the respondent No.1/State.
None for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 11.06.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri has been received whereby after

recording statements of complainant Preeti and the accused persons,

namely Rajat and Meena, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the

compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties,

without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Moreover, a perusal of the record reveals that the parties have

given final effect to their agreement settlement/compromise (Annexure

P2) and that nothing is due towards anyone on account of this settlement

and that the final effect be given to this petition.

1 of 2
28-10-2019 22:03:33 :::
CRM-M No.76009 of 2018 2

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.226 dated 25.06.2014 under Sections 498A, Section406, Section506 IPC

(Section 376 SectionIPC being already deleted) pertaining to Police Station

Farakpur, District Yamunanagar and all consequences arising out of the

said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
October 18, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
28-10-2019 22:03:33 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation