SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajeev Kapoor & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 6 November, 2019

$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 06.11.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4209/2019 Crl.M.A. 34318/2019
RAJEEV KAPOOR ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr.Deepak Vohra, Adv. with
Mr.Siddhat Jain, Adv.

versus

STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State.
Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. with Ms.Swati
Chawla, Mr.R.K. Kohli Ms.Jyoti
Kohli, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in
person.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR

No.93/2013 registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

CRL.M.C.4209/2019 Page 1 of 3

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 20.04.2008 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock

namely Shelja @ Riya. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from

02.12.2010.

5. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement in

Counselling Cell vide settlement deed dated 20.09.2017 and settled all their

disputes amicably.

6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Ajay of Police Station Kirti Nagar and submits that matter

has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

CRL.M.C.4209/2019 Page 2 of 3

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.93/2013 registered at

Police Station Kirti Nagar instituted for the offences punishable under

Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings emanating

therefrom are quashed.

9. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

10. Pending application also stands disposed of.

11. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 06, 2019
ab

CRL.M.C.4209/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation