SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju vs State on 10 April, 2017

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3066 / 2017
Rajendra Kumar @ Raju S/o Rajeshwar Dayal Sharma, Age 56
years, R/o 1 Bhom Parmeshwar Marg, Out side Chandpole,
Hanumanghat, P.S. Amba Mata, Udaipur.
(At present lodged in Central Jail, Udaipur)

The State of Rajasthan

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.K.Garg.

For Respondent(s) : Mr.Pankaj Awasthi, P.P.
Judgment / Order

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in relation to

F.I.R. No.122/2017, P.S. Amba Mata, Udaipur, for the offence

under Section 354 I.P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

The F.I.R. was lodged after two days of the incident. In

complainant’s statements recorded under Section 161 and 164

Cr.P.C., she alleged that she approached the massage centre of

the present petitioner with a complaint of having back pain. As per

the allegation set out in the statement recorded under Section 164

Cr.P.C., the petitioner is alleged to have started pressing the

pressure points of the complainant and then allegedly grabbed her
(2 of 2)

hips. The complainant raised a hue and cry that she had not

allowed the petitioner to do so and thereafter, ran out of the


Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as

available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments

advanced at the Bar, but without commenting on the merits of the

case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be

enlarged on bail.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner namely Rajendra Kumar @ Raju

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.122/2017, P.S. Amba Mata,

Udaipur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal

bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to

appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so.


/tarun goyal/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation