SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajesh Grover & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 1 November, 2019

$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 01.11.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 4170/2019
RAJESH GROVER ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr.Neeraj Deora, Adv.

versus

STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State
ASI Pritam Singh PS

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR

No.935/2014 dated 09.12.2014 registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2

and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is

taken up for final disposal.

CRL.M.C.4170/2019 Page 1 of 3

4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 27.01.2014 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

5. The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide MOU dated

04.12.2017 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Pritam Singh of Police Station Ambedkar Nagar and

submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the

matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.935/2014 dated

09.12.2014 registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

CRL.M.C.4170/2019 Page 2 of 3

9. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

10. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 01, 2019
ab

CRL.M.C.4170/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation