SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajinder Kaur vs Varinder Kumar on 15 May, 2018

TA-144-2017 (OM) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

TA-144-2017 (OM)
Date of decision: 15.05.2018

Rajinder Kaur
…..Petitioner
versus
Varinder Kumar
……Respondent

CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh

Present: Mr.K.S.Khaira, Advocate for
Mr.Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner
None for the respondent

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the
judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Kuldip Singh, J. (Oral)

Respondent has not appeared despite service.

Petitioner seeks transfer of petition filed under Section 9 of

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the respondent titled as Varinder Kumar vs.

Rajinder Kaur pending in the Court of learned District Judge, Ludhiana to a

Court of competent jurisdiction at District Hoshiarpur.

Respondent has not come present to oppose the petition despite

service by way of affixation.

Perusal of petition shows that respondent has already filed a

petition under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 at Hoshiarpur. Two other

cases i.e. one under Section 498-A IPC and one under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

are already pending at Garhshankar Courts, District Hoshiarpur. Petitioner

stated that she has got no source of income and she is to look after her two

minor children.

1 of 2
20-05-2018 15:09:48 :::
TA-144-2017 (OM) 2

Considering the difficulty expressed by the petitioner and the

fact that her case for custody of minor children is already pending at

Hoshiarpur Courts, petition filed under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act,

1955 by the respondent titled as Varinder Kumar vs. Rajinder Kaur pending

in the Court of learned District Judge, Ludhiana is withdrawn from the said

Court and is transferred to learned District Judge, Hoshiarpur, who may

retain the same himself or entrust it to a Court of competent jurisdiction.

Present petition stands allowed accordingly.

Since the main case has been allowed, therefore, the pending

CM, if any, also stands disposed of.

15.05.2018 (Kuldip Singh)
gk Judge

Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes
Whether Reportable: No

2 of 2
20-05-2018 15:09:49 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh