SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rajneesh Singh @ Satendra And … vs State Of U.P. And Another on 30 July, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 70

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 29294 of 2019

Applicant :- Rajneesh Singh @ Satendra And Another

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Lal Vijai Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey and Sri Rohit Nandan Pandey, Advocates have filed their Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2 is taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 129 of 2019 dated 05.04.2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 80 of 2019 and proceedings of criminal case no. 1562 of 2019 (State Vs. Upendra Kumar and others), under Sections 498A, Section304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Ajeetmal, District – Auraiya pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya.

The learned counsel for the applicants after advancing his arguments at some length, gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet dated 05.04.2019 against the applicants and requested to grant some protection, so that applicants may surrender before the court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application and prayed that a direction be issued to the courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.

Considering the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case applicants appear before the concerned court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with settled law laid down by the Seven Judges’ decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437 Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

For the period of 45 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

With the above observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

Order Date :- 30.7.2019

AK Pandey

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation