SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Raju Singh vs State Of U.P. on 27 September, 2019


?Court No. – 34

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. – 1656 of 1996

Revisionist :- Raju Singh

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Revisionist :- U.C.Misra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.

2. This criminal revision under Section 397/Section401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by the judgments and orders dated 03.09.1996 and 04.10.1996. The IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Dehat vide judgment and order dated 03.09.1996 convicted Revisionist for offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced him to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment. Thereagainst, Revisionist preferred Criminal Appeal No.31 of 1996 before Court of District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat (hereinafter referred to as ?Appellate Court?) and Appellate Court while dismissing appeal vide judgment and order dated 04.10.1996 confirmed judgment and order of conviction passed by Trial Court. Being aggrieved the revisionist preferred present revision.

3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.

4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.

Order Date :- 27.9.2019

Manish Himwan



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation