SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rama Devi And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 2 August, 2017


Criminal Misc. M- No. 7799 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : August 02, 2017

Rama Devi and another …..Petitioners


State of Haryana and another ….Respondents


Present: Mr. R.S. Pandher, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay K. Saini, AAG, Haryana.


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioners in FIR No. 22 dated 12.01.2017 registered under Sections 498A,

406, 506 IPC at Police Station City Jagadhri.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has

been amicably resolved between the parties. The terms and conditions of the

settlement were reduced into writing on 28.04.2017. This fact could not be

brought to the notice of the Court when the matter was listed on 28.04.2017

as the same was not communicated to learned counsel till then. Photocopies

of the said settlement alongwith the affidavits of respondent No. 2 and

petitioner No. 2 produced in Court today are taken on record subject to just

exceptions. The parties, it is submitted, have decided to part ways. A

petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 shall be filed

by respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 2. It is, thus, prayed that this petition

be allowed.

1 of 2
07-08-2017 02:27:20 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 7799 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Mehar

Singh verifies that the matter has been amicably resolved. It is informed

that cancellation report has been prepared on 15.06.2017.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 08.03.2017

is made absolute.

However, liberty is afforded to respondent No.2 to move an

appropriate application, in case, any of the facts mentioned above are not


A sum of `25,000/- deposited as litigation expenses in

compliance with order dated 08.03.2017 be released to respondent No. 2

against adequate proof of identity.

(Lisa Gill)
August 02, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
07-08-2017 02:27:21 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation