SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rambali Chourasia @ Rambali Chou & … vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 20 April, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9055 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1142 Year- 2000 Thana -SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE
District- –

1. Rambali Chourasia @ Rambali Chou S/O Ram Bilash Chaurasia Resident Of
Village- Sonma, P.S.- Bakhri, District- Begusarai

2. Ram Bilash Chourasia S/O Dhorhai Chourasia Resident Of Village- Sonma, P.S.-
Bakhri, District- Begusarai

3. Ram Dular Chourasia S/O Ram Bilash Chaurasia Resident Of Village- Sonma,
P.S.- Bakhri, District- Begusarai

…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Kiran Kumari W/O Rambali Chourasia, D/O Sukan Bhagat Resident Of Village-
Kothia, P.S.- Bangra Tajpur, District- Samastipur

…. …. Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Thakur
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.Roy ‘Raman’APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 20-04-2017

Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Thakur in support of the

application which is directed against the order dated 16.11.2012

passed by learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Samastipur in Cr.

Revision No. 180 of 2012 filed by O.P. No. 2 who lodged the

complaint against the present petitioners under Section 498A IPC.

It appears the learned Court below had discharged the

petitioners of the charge as no witness was produced for examination.

The learned Revisional Court found that there was a petition filed by

the complainant which remained pending for consideration and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9055 of 2013 dt.20-04-2017

2/2

without considering the same, said order was passed.

Mr. Thakur made diverse submissions in support of the

application.

I have perused the statement made in the application and

the reasonings assigned by the learned Revisional Court. There is no

patent illegality in the said order dated 16.11.2012 meriting

interference therewith.

The application is dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/-

AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date 21.04.2017
Transmission 21.04.2017
Date

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation