SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ramdeen vs State Of U.P. on 1 November, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 67

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 37174 of 2019

Applicant :- Ramdeen

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Awadhesh Kumar Yadav

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in case crime no. 108 of 2019, under Section 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Siddharthnagar, District Siddharthnagar is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that initially the FIR of the incident was got registered by the mother of the victim under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act on 17.04.2019 with the allegation that on 14.04.2019 while her daughter was coming back, the applicant has snatched her daughter inside the mobile shop and misbehaved with her daughter. She in her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has reiterated the allegation mentioned in the FIR. In the statements under Sections 161 and Section164 Cr.P.C., the girl has magnified the allegation by mentioning that she was ravished by the applicant but the medical do not support the allegation of rape upon her. Her hymen is old ruptured and healed. The age of the girl is 17+ years. It is further contended by the counsel that on account of village partybandi and at behest of Bhola Pradhan this FIR was got registered against the applicant. He lastly submitted that the applicant is in jail since 23.04.2019 is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of trial.

Per contra learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforementioned facts.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail.

In view of the above, let the applicant- Ramdeen be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in case crime no. 108 of 2019, under Section 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Siddharthnagar, District Siddharthnagar with the following conditions:-

(i) THE APPLICANT SHALL FILE AN UNDERTAKING TO THE EFFECT THAT HE/SHE SHALL NOT SEEK ANY ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE FIXED FOR EVIDENCE WHEN THE WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN COURT. IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

(ii) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON EACH DATE FIXED, EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH HIS/HER COUNSEL. IN CASE OF HIS/HER ABSENCE, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THE TRIAL COURT MAY PROCEED AGAINST HIM/HER UNDER SECTION 229-A SectionIPC.

(iii) IN CASE, THE APPLICANT MISUSES THE LIBERTY OF BAIL DURING TRIAL AND IN ORDER TO SECURE HIS/HER PRESENCE PROCLAMATION UNDER SECTION 82 CR.P.C., MAY BE ISSUED AND IF APPLICANT FAILS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT ON THE DATE FIXED IN SUCH PROCLAMATION, THEN, THE TRIAL COURT SHALL INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM/HER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, UNDER SECTION 174-A SectionIPC.

(iv) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT, IN PERSON, BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON DATES FIXED FOR (1) OPENING OF THE CASE, (2) FRAMING OF CHARGE AND (3) RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 313 CR.P.C. IF IN THE OPINION OF THE TRIAL COURT ABSENCE OF THE APPLICANT IS DELIBERATE OR WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THEN IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT SUCH DEFAULT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PROCEED AGAINST THE HIM/HER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

(v) THE TRIAL COURT MAY MAKE ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS/ENDEAVOUR AND TRY TO CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE APPLICANT.

However, it is made clear that any wilful violation of above conditions by the applicant, shall have serious repercussion on his/her bail so granted by this court and the trial court is at liberty to cancel the bail, after recording the reasons for doing so, in the given case of any of the condition mentioned above.

Order Date :- 1.11.2019

Abhishek Sri.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation