SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ramen Mondal vs Unknown on 24 February, 2020

1

24.02.2020
37

Saswata
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 1961 of 2020

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.02.2020 in connection
with Baishnabnagar P. S. Case No. 291 of 2019 dated 17.06.2019
under Sections 498A/325/506/376/511/354/341 of the IPC read
with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Ramen Mondal
… Petitioner.

Ms. Ishita Biswas
…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Madhu Sudan Sur, Ld. APP
Mr. Manoranjan Mahata
…..for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is the

brother-in-law of the victim/housewife and has been falsely

implicate in the instant case. The allegation against the petitioner

of attempting to rape the victim is bereft of material particulars

with regard to date and time.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and keeping in

mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime

in light of the submission as to the vagueness in the accusation of

the victim/housewife, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

the petitioner.

2

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner

be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the

petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once in a week until

further orders. Petitioner shall appear before the investigating

officer and hand over his passport, if any, within a period of two

weeks from date. In the event the petitioner does not have

passport, he shall personally appear before the investigating officer

and furnish affidavit to that effect within the time frame

mentioned herein above.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation