SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ramjan vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 December, 2019


?Court No. – 71

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 49043 of 2019

Applicant :- Ramjan

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. Counter affidavit filed today. Taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Rai, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.B. Maurya, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant – Ramjan with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. – 178 of 2019, under Section – 377 SectionI.P.C. and 5M/6 POCSO Act, Police Station – Ramkola, District – Kushinagar, during pendency of trial.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:

(i) the applicant is accused of unnatural sex, punishable with imprisonment upto life;

(ii) against FIR lodged on 02.07.2019, the applicant is in confinement since 04.07.2019;

(iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;

(iv) the applicant has no criminal history;

(v) chargesheet has already been submitted, trial has commenced but there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial;

(vi) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted though the FIR allegations are there against the applicant, however, neither there is statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nor 164 SectionCr.P.C. Then, it has been submitted that there are no eye-witness as well;

(vii) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial.

5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.

(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

6. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.

7. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

8. It is made clear that, in the event of violation of any terms and conditions of the bail order or in the event of any attempt being made by the applicant to intimidate the witness or to tamper the evidence, the informant shall be at liberty to file a bail cancellation application supported by the relevant material, that application if filed, may be taken up on priority.

Order Date :- 7.12.2019




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation