SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ramotar vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 10 July, 2017

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 8652 / 2017
Ramotar S/o Bhajan B/c Meena, Aged About 47 Years, R/o

Kirwada, Police Station Shri Mahaveer Ji, Distt. Karauli (raj.)

State of Rajasthan Through PP

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakash Thakuriya, PP
Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman
Judgment / Order

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 438 of


2. F.I.R. No.82/2017 was registered at Police Station, Shri

Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli for offence under Sections 323, 341,

354, 452 379 I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the

petitioner is uncle-in-law of the complainant. The allegations

pertaining to under Section 354 I.P.C. are against the sons of the

petitioner and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he

has been pressurizing the complainant to give share in the


4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant
(2 of 2)

have opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the contentions, I deem it proper to allow the

anticipatory bail.

6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The

S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Shri Mahaveer Ji, District

Karauli in F.I.R. No.82/2017, is directed that in the event of arrest of the

petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following


(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts

to the Court or any police officer, and

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous

permission of the Court.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation